Webcomic Book Club Full Reviews
of Teaching Baby Paranoia by Bryant Paul Johnson


All in all, Teaching Baby Paranoia strikes me a lot like Something Positive. It's caustic, abrasive, and has some very strong views on some rather touchy subjects. Of course, TBP is also a lot like the old joke, "'Gullible' is written on the ceiling." This combination makes for an... interesting read, to say the least.

The characters are all fictitious (or are they?), but are typically linked together in multiple ways and most of them (or all, I'm not quite sure on a few) are facets of the author's personality. One part is his geekiness, another is his 'cool', and yet a third is his 'salty old soul with a burning hatred for the sea'. I imagine that the links would be fascinating to follow, had I not read things in pieces and gotten myself thoroughly confused several times. I did notice some of the links during my last reading session and following some of them proved most interesting.

The artwork is crisp, clean, and while the colors were often 'off' and threw me for a loop, I eventually got used to them. The scheme (especially when he used brownscale) was very fitting in regards to...

...the writing, which often took on a "Tales from History" theme. Of course, this is rather like the Fractured Fairy Tales from Rocky & Bullwinkle. TBP tells tales that ring of falsity, but then, they also ring partially of truth. The footnotes were interesting, sometimes useful, but largely a bit of a bother, at least in the 'weekly' display format that Modern Tales uses.

Due to the "moose and squirrel" sideshow themes, Faultish footnotes, and confusing colors, Teaching Baby Paranoia gets a 6 out of 10 from me. I liked it, but not enough to keep reading.
Review by Xenix Tue Dec 16 2003 03:00 PM

Bryant Paul Johnson strikes me as someone who would make a charming dinner guest, full of intriguing little anecdotes and dubious factoids of history. My feelings regarding the comics are a bit mixed. I started out disliking them, but the writing and artwork improved enormously over the span of the archives and I warmed to them by the end.

The earlier strips offered tepid jabs at fast food ingredients, pro-wrestling, parking restrictions, door-to-door evangelists, the NRA, Fox news etc. They really didn't get at the absurdity of these things so much as parade them out like a list of things to be scorned.

A few managed to generate a mild grin but most just weren't that funny or insightful. Thankfully however, the strip shifted gears to stake out a more distinctive motif that seems closer to the cartoonist's heart. The mid to later strips offer brief snippets from quirky moments in history--embellished with some absurdity or often totally fabricated. This material was still kind of hit and miss for me, but at least it was fresher. Some of them reminded me a bit of Carol Lay's "Story Minutes" in structure and tone.

I liked the style and line work of the art, but the early compositions were kind of drab. I kept hoping the artist would cut loose a little more. Every other strip seemed to open with a medium shot of some scruffy guy with bad posture standing in front of a row of generic buildings the same distance back on the horizon line. But the artwork did improve a great deal and I enjoyed the use of color and the overall look of the later strips very much.

I think my biggest problem with the writing was that most every strip was a let down in some way. They always started out great with some intriguing premise that hooked me through the first few panels but then, more often than not, they just fizzled. A perfect example is "Canis Ex Terra". Great start (even a funny dog pic) that ultimately didn't build to anything satisfying. Same issue with "That Is So 1880's", and many others. The endings are there and I see the gags, but they just don't compare to the great build ups.

I'll offer my handful of favorites that I thought were noteworthy from the early to mid period. After about chapter 32, all are fairly consistent.
http://www.moderntales.com/bryant_temp/tbp007.gif
http://www.moderntales.com/teachingbabyparanoia/tbp021gt4.gif
http://www.moderntales.com/bryant_temp/tbp052.gif
http://www.moderntales.com/teachingbabyparanoia/tbp082sla.gif
http://www.moderntales.com/teachingbabyparanoia/tbp121moo.gif
http://www.moderntales.com/teachingbabyparanoia/tbp130clv.gif
http://www.moderntales.com/teachingbabyparanoia/tbp131h3x.gif

I wouldn't recommend reading too many at a time. These strips do not form a cohesive story, so they are best digested in sample doses.
Review by The Phantom Critic Sun Dec 14 2003 08:25 PM

Art: Well, on one hand, the art has a nice, stylized feel to it. Everything seems well done, if not spectacular. The only main gripe is the one that several others have raised up...there's not a huge amount of variation from person to person. It's not a huge flaw or anything, but it does detract slightly.

Story: Well, it's not so much story as stories. A strange amalgation of historical fact and fiction, it was quite interesting...the main flaw being the problem in distinguishing the two. Perhaps it's just me, but I'd like to know just how much of it is documented history, and how much of it is the author's speculation. If it doesn't really matter to you whether it's fact or fiction, then it's certainly interesting, however. The various footnotes that appear later on are somewhat helpful, though I'm not entirely sure how much of these footnotes I should take as fact, much like the rest of the webcomic.

Characters: Well, there's a lot of them, and you won't be seeing many repeat customers. Since it is apparently the author's intent to combine history and speculation, and so, barring a few story arcs, the characters change as he skips from country to country, era to era. The glimpses we get of them are too brief to really pass much judgement upon...but then again, it's all speculation and history.

Overall: Well, it's different. I'd certainly recommend it for a good read, as long as you read it with a grain of salt. Fiction, speculation, and hard historical fact are all jumbled together...and there's some good and some bad to that. Overall, "Teaching Baby Paranoia" nets itself a 8/10 from me.
Review by Luthorne Sun Dec 14 2003 03:07 PM

Art: Teaching Baby Paranoia has a simple but gritty feel to the art. It's not that detailed, but there's a definite style to it...my impression is that it's somber. However, as one other person has noted, the characters look very similar. Beards are bushy, hair is wild or well combed (one or the other)-and every man seems to wear a tie. I like the style, but I want to see more variety in it.

Characters: There are no continuous characters in "TBP", as I'll call it to save space. Though the author appears the most in the comic, he becomes a narrator rather than a real character. I don't mind this change, since the stories that are told are entertaining.

Story: Like the characters, there are no continuous stories in "TBP". While several stories arcs have been done, they usually don't link together. I like the format of the stories in the comic, though, short as they are.

Writing: I have one big issue with the writing for "Teaching Baby Paranoia": separating fact from fiction. On the one hand, the author does a very good job of mixing them. On the other, it frustrates me to think that there are possibly interesting stories to tell from history, but I can't be sure about what is real and what isn't. The footnotes don't shed much light on it either, so I'm left wondering with each story. Except for a few, that is. I can appreciate how difficult it is to bring fact and fiction together without leaving a hole, but I'd like some kind of sign. Of course, I may be asking for too much on this score.

Overall: "Teaching Baby Paranoia" is an interesting comic, and it's one that I want to keep up with. However, I'm not sure I enjoy the fact that I keep having to guess. 7 out of 10.
Review by Benor Sun Dec 14 2003 02:00 PM

"In late 2003, Salen Stormwing, a comic-reviewing ferret, set out on his latest task..."

"To review Teaching Baby Paranoia. Dook! And yes, thats how this review is going to start. Much like almost every comic of TBP (I'll use this term since Teaching Baby Paranoia is a lot to write out), I have set the stage."

"The comic itself is one of presenting facts about historical and 'historically fictional' events in an entertaining way. Or at the very least, in a vague, car-accident that you want to see what happened if just because its different and somewhat disturbing. Its mostly humorous, but not in the usual fashion. Its more like funny in a fact is scarier than fiction sort of way.

Artwork: "Its clean, it works for the comic, and all the people in the comic sort of blend together. You never really can tell who's who in the comic, but considering that the comic jumps to different 'stories' almost every single comic, with very few 'story archs' appearing, the fact that the characters tend to look vaguly similiar doesn't really hurt the comic. Your gunna be told who's who in the comic, so no worries. At times though, the greyscale, or near gray scale seems a bit wierd, but I guess in the grand scheme of coloring, it works for the comic. No need for tons of color. There are a few comics with color, but most of them are muted if they do."

"In the grand scheme of things, the art is pretty plain, but is much better overall than some comics, and there's nothing overtly wront with the style. It might not wow you, but it works."

Characters: "Characters, except for a few story archs, almost all the characters are just one time deals that you'll see. Only a few characters seem to have any sort of recurring roles, like the artist and a few others. Not much to report on."

Writing: "Ok, this is where the comic works overtime. A lot of the writing involves taking stories and tales, and writing them in such a way to be humorous, or at least just be disturbingly funny. Sometimes its hard to tell early on, if a story is based on fact, or the author's fictitious stories. Later on, it becomes easier, as the author adds footnotes to the stories, to help provide information about each strip. In some way... reading the comic was like reading a Penny Arcade comic, but instead of talking about video games or some such... its about stories of fact and fiction, showing you the dark and humorous side of the world. Or maybe not. I actually meant what I said as a compliment."

"Early on, the comic didn't seem to have as much focus as it does later on. Earlier, it seems to be a mish of 'stories' and 'political commentary' but later on, its more centered towards presenting the stories. Some of the humor in some of the comics can be a bit hit or miss on occasion, but usually its pretty good at getting a chuckle out of me, even if its a chuckle that I'd rather not admit to."

Plot: "Not much on this field to mention, as the comic has very few story archs to mention as well."

Overall: "Its a good comic. Its sort of dark and sort of disturbing, but at the same time, you really do wonder what you're gunna see next. Not all the stories were as funny or interesting as others, but most of them were. I'm not sure I'd continue to read this comic or not though. While the small stories in each comic are entertaining to read, I'm not sure I'd read each comic as it comes along, but probably more in waiting a month or two and reading a bunch of them in one sitting instead."

"The one bad point of the comic, more than anything else, is the text. Early on, its unbearably hard to read, to the point that you have to read one word three or four times to figure out what the word is, and then you have more words to figure out after that. Later on, this problem pretty much disappears, but it is sad that the beginning was just painful to try to read, not because of the writing, but because of how small and squished the letters were."

"But still, its a good comic, even if I can't figure out what the title of the comic is supposed to mean. Maybe it doesn't mean anything. *shrug* No clue. Oh well, anyways, if you have some time to spare, and a Modern tales account, you should probably check this comic out."

Score: 8 shinies out of 10.
Review by Salen Stormwing Fri Dec 12 2003 08:09 PM

A review of Teaching Baby Paranoia
by Kajamir the Giant

Teaching Baby Paranoia was a pretty interesting webcomic, I think. Rather than get a purely fictional gag strip offered up, we're reminded that the truth is stranger. Even more so then, when that truth is given the Baron Munchhausen work over. I found Teaching Baby Paranoia damnably interesting. The author embellishes unusual and disturbing tales of humanity's often lurid deeds, which creates something I couldn't look easily away from. There was only one problem with this method. He doesn't explain what exactly is fact and fiction which could prove to be very frustrating. Say what you will though, he makes a good story at least.

Teaching Baby Paranoia plays through this idea for some time, though more in the beginning you'll find more purely fictional pieces that were kind of aimless as the author seemed to be experimenting what was comfortable for him. After a few sort of do-nothing strips like the sailor supposedly making an analogy about Microsoft, the real meat of this strip is the scandalous stories of our world with the author's peculiar sense of exaggeration. Some pieces are darkly humorous and others are simply disturbing on an intellectual and moral level. Mainly, I was glued to reading these bastardizations.

Eventually, the author adds in footnotes to each comic explaining the background of what's being read, not to mention an occasional slip of what's been changed. The author also argues with an editor. Whether real or not, that's how this entire comic works. It's a good show one way or another.

The art isn't the greatest, per se. I'm inclined to like the uniquely scruffy looks and dour character designs, but after a while, a lot of them pretty much blend together and you'd swear you were looking at a world whose ancestors were all salty pirates. The coloring is pretty drab to the point things would be fine without it.

Aside from the hit and miss complications of the Munchausen syndrome being interjected, my only main beef was the text for this strip. In the beginning? Nigh impossible to read from being so small and squished. But like any good improving comic, it alleviates later on.

This webcomic feels like it's in a niche of it's own. Sometimes rambling, sometimes informative, but usually quite interesting. I would actually like to read more of this webcomic based on it's morbid fascination factor. I give Teaching Baby Paranoia an 8.5 of 10 stars. I don't imagine it's everyone's flavor since it's a bit unconventional by content, but it stands pretty well by itself.
Review by Kajamir the Giant Wed Dec 10 2003 05:24 AM

Summary Reviews for this title | Submit a title for review | Title Index