Webcomic Book Club Full Reviews
of JerkCity by Rands, Deuce, Spigot, Pants


Um, just a note folks, I am a regular user of MicroSoft Chat. You just log in some characters and pick your image and then type in your dialogue. Select a pose or expression for your character and hit ENTER. The MicroSoft Chat makes a comic out of your conversation on the fly. That fast and that easy. The background is selected or changed at any time, so each frame automatically has custom sized speech or action bubbles and all placed on the fly over a background of your choice.

Now the default backgrounds and characters are all in black and white. There are also colorized versions of them.

Just one little hang up. When you go to save the comics you have, for some reason, they save only in Black and White.

So.

All one needs to do is type the dialogue. That is all the effort it requires. Then you save the automatically generated image and do what you will with it. Like run a comic for umpteen years.

So, the text alone is the real deal in this. You either like it or you don't. The rest is just generated by a machine.

Now you can have custom AVBs which is what these multi-pose image files are called. I have a set of my own, Yao Chi that is. But this comic is using the stock AVBs that come from MicroSoft.

Thought folks ought to know.
Review by Yao Chi Sun Feb 13 2005 11:43 PM

DId you ever know someone in high school or college, who kept coming up with stupid ideas and thinking they were briliant? I bet you did. Didn't you want to slap them upside the head? Well, if you've still got the chance, take it. You might be able to prevent another "Jerkcity" from happening. And if you can, you should.

Though I don't know the secrets behind the creation of "Jerkcity," I'm pretty sure they involve chat logs and a word processing program, so they can get rid of anything smacking of intelligent conversation before they make the comic. It's clip art backgrounds, clip art characters, and stupid dialogue. I'm not even sure I can count them as jokes, since they basically consist of gibberish and references to gay porn. It's not even a guilty pleasure; it's just guilt. No progression, no characters of interest, no effort at making it funny or interesting. "Jerkcity" has nothing to offer you, and it manages to feel like "Get Your War On" without as much intelligence. 1 out of 10.
Review by Benor Sun Feb 13 2005 08:46 PM

HI.

MY OPINIONS ON WEBCOMICS ARE IMPORTANT.

DICKS/PRICKS (CLICK ONE)

I've come to realize something in doing this, that reviews of webcomics for the most part are unnecessary. Webcomics, no matter how good, bad or obscure, will develop a fanbase. It is usually because people are suckers for certain genres and art styles. It is also because webcomics are free. If there's really no cost in looking at a webcomic and deciding for yourself whether you like it or not, what point is there?

That's what people have told me, and I still have some reasons for doing it. One reason is that I feel that sometimes the authors could actually derive some meaningful help from my criticism. It's happened. Another function is to promote comics that are not in the spotlight yet if they're good. My main reason, though, is that it's fun. It's fun to write an opinion on anything, really, because on the internet it doesn't really matter what other people think of your views. Don't like cheese? Say something about it. Are you into ska-trance? Tell me more. Honestly, there's not much effort put into writing these things, and if you get a strong opinion one way or another about them, then you live an easier life than I do. I've stopped caring a long time ago.

This is all relevant because what I am about to 'review' has got to be the most bizarre webcomic ever. It uses an old program called Microsoft Comic Chat and the art of Jim Woodring to create a series of talking heads to speak in all caps, mostly talking about internet jokes, gay jokes, dick jokes and HUGLAGHALGHALGHAL. To be blunt: it's crap. Not preachy, incomrehensible morals over a pathetic non-issue crap, not schizophreniccombination of weak jokes and stupid, overwrought drama crap, not incredibly lame, ugly, overlong with a circle-jerking fanbase crap or so inept that it's not even funny to laugh at crap. It's a different kind of crap. It's a crap that knows it's crap, and revels in its own crappiness. Even the dubiously named author knows its crap and is surprised it has lasted this long. Clearly, there must be something special about this comic, as certain people just LOVE this junk.

I think it's the absolute lack of pretense and unabashed aversion from quality.

The comic has been described as a continuous story, just composed out of order. Fittingly, my method of viewing it has been through constantly cliking the random button. A comic from 1998 is indistinguishable from a comic from 2005, so there wasn't any problem regarding clashing or contrasting styles. Reading it was like walking through some kind of acid flashback (not that I know what that's like) in which the same thing happened all the time, but I had the feeling that each time was different. The jokes are all about the characters' apparent joy of dicks and homoeroticism, or it could all be just that they are continually sarcastic over that kind of stuff. Really, who can tell? Oftentimes, the dialogue is disjointed and nonsensical, about half the time not being able to stay in the same thought process through three panels. The strip is one giant non-sequitor, and for some reason I kept feeling compelled to go on.

Something happened while I was reading it. After reading about twenty strips in a row, they started to make sense. The jokes were getting funnier. I can't explain it accurately now, as I'm not reading it at the moment and I did not save the links to the comics, but I just hit a vibe. The dialogue, at first nearly incomprehensible, sounded reasonable! The leaps from one topic to another suddenly made sense, as in it was funny just because it didn't make sense. I was laughing at the sheer absurdity of the comic because there was nothing linking it to reality, yet I felt like there was. Really, does this make sense to you? Or this or this? Read a bunch of strips and come back to me.

I've compared comics to automotive accidents in the past, but now I realize that those weren't good analogies, as they weren't the kind I'd come back to just to get a glimpse at the horror. The strip was like several accidents happening one right after another, as if I were watching World's Wildest Police Chases. After a while, I just became entranced by the thought of vehicles colliding and started considering them an art form even though they were merely grotesque products of human stupidity.

I think Jerkcity's secret is that it's intentionally stupid and nonsensical, but the bizarre and surreal nature and stark simplicity of the comic will make people try to understand its schtick. In doing so, they will gradually get more stupid until they fall into a the right wavelength that Jerkcity eminates. Drugs help.

So read it if you want. A review of this comic doesn't matter, since it has already fallen into its own niche and knows exactly what it's all about. The people who read this comic have already formed their own opinion. No outside views will change your own opinion of this comic, and the author certainly doesn't need any help that I can provide. In this case, I can only give you the info. What you decide to do with it is up to you.

So proceed with caution.
I guess there's nothing cool about punching a florist.
Review by Cobra Mon Feb 07 2005 09:25 AM

Visitor Reviews & Comments

"I'm throwing up pickles I never ate"

One of the best lines in internet history

Five stars
Review by Sh0t Wed Sep 21 2005 01:13 AM

In my opinion, anyone who criticizes Jerkcity for a supposed lack of "content" or "progression" (or any other idea they like to throw around when they think they're being observed) has missed the point of the strip entirely. It's agressive, confrontational toilet humor expressly designed, to the extent that it is "designed" at all, to provoke reactionaries and draw attention to the basic futility of trying to accomplish anything by telling actual stories.
Review by A judicious observer. Thu Feb 24 2005 07:18 PM

Summary Reviews for this title | Submit a title for review | Title Index