Webcomic Book Club Full Reviews
of A Drug War Carol by Susan Wells & Scott Bieser


A review of A Drug War Carol
by Kajamir the Giant

When it came time to reviewing this 'webcomic', I came across an impasse about whether to judge it for what it possessed as a comic, or simply write it off as propaganda. With a bit of deliberation, I've decided ADWC will be treated as a typical comic on the basis that more or less all current webcomics that have little points to bring across (Shaw Island, Ozy & Millie), that are inherently attempting to bring the reader to their own side of an idea in an often fairly one sided manner, sometimes subtlety mixed in with humor. That by itself could be construed as manipulative end, not terribly dissimiliar to propaganda itself. So while ADWC might be more blatant and single minded in its aim, I'm going to treat it much like anything else.

Starting with the art, ADWC is fairly good. I don't know how else to describe it other than it reminds me a lot of Ward's work on the MZDM comic, which I'm rather favorable to. The other half of the style presented is something more akin of a real comic book, minus the old style bulkiness of body. As such, image wise, I liked what I was seeing. The last two ghosts are fairly described as appealing to the eye and the images of people from the early to mid century seem styled well enough for them to be believable.

When it comes to the designs of those featured, they're fairly on the mark, although there's sort of an overplayed miscreant cartoonish villainy to some of those presented as being 'bad guys'. A lot of the content is generally on a serious mark, so it breaks the mood with corniness just a little. I would also question why the constant and sometimes pointless quote links exist only at the beginning (click the images).

As effective propaganda, I wouldn't be impressed by this. The first ghost sequence lags badly in terms of explaining things. If I was the senator listening to him, I'd probably fall asleep or wander off. It's little else than long winded rambling, more something to describe an alleged history, than to convince anyone of anything. Only when things are more prone to heart tugging in the shorter second and third ghost sequences, does it seem more effective, although at this point in my life it has no real impact. I will admit a scene of powerful imagery comes in the future sequence with little Tim and his father hiding in the bathtub. But beyond this, I never felt particularly impassioned about any of this. As propaganda to convince of someone's interests, it does not work. As a comic by itself, it's not something people would buy anywhere. It's a somewhat palatable take-off of a Christmas Carol when it remembers that's the source material, but it lacks a power to be anything else than propaganda. To that end, I can't say really that this is entirely a thing worth reading since it serves a purpose, but fails at it.

My own politics are generally for pot being legal. But I would have preferred a more honest and diversified approach to what was made, such as people using the drug for recreation, probably a lot more in use than people overrall need it for more medical purposes. It rather comes across as being ashamed that could be someone's motive, perhaps even the authors. In days like these where High Times magazines can fill every convenience store next to Archie comics and pot references in popular media are about as common as pennies in a bank vault, this sort of ashamed closet mentality seems unnecessary or even deceptive. But again, it is propaganda, and little else.

Because this 'comic' fails its very singular purpose, I can't really recommend it to anyone. It looks nice though, so perhaps if the reader was interested in the art alone, a casual perusal might be alright. Still, to everyone else, I can only shrug.

I give A Drug War Carol 3 of 10 stars. It's a one shot 'story' and has no real re-reading value.
Review by Kajamir the Giant Thu Apr 03 2003 09:21 PM

As an argument, I thought that A Drug War Carol was good, though somewhat heavy-handed. As a comic, though, I wasn't as pleased.

The art is done well, in my opinion. The figures are pretty realistic, as is the setting. This doesn't change, no matter where the story goes...nothing really stood out but the Ghost of the Future, though. And he felt rather jarring in comparison to every other character design. On the other hand, I can't think of a better fit myself, so I suppose that was the intended effect.

The characters, for the most part, are rather shallow. Either they don't get enough attention, or they continue with the same message. And I was not happy about the sudden turn-around from the 'protagonist'. He had shown no change at all before then, and it annoyed me because of how arbitrary it seemed.

The actual message, however, is the most important part to this selection. And for content, I think it's very good. There's a lot of information about drug addiction in general, and marijuana in general, that would cause most to consider. For presentation, though, it could be heavy-handed. And after all the information that was presented by the Ghost of Christmas Past, the sections for the other two spirits was far too short.

I can understand why this propaganda piece was presented as a comic. It helps to catch the eye, and gives a face to the statistics and examples that were used. But purely as a comic, I am not that impressed. The parody of "A Christmas Carol" was done in a loose faction, and it almost seemed unrelated at points.

As an argument, though, I think it's a good basis. Some of the dialogue should probably be softened, and more attention should be paid to modern statistics-both in adding more, and putting them with the Ghost of the Present so he has more time.

I give A Drug War Carol 7.5 out of ten for information/opinion, and 5 out of ten for the comic. In this case, I think those should be separated. However, that's simply my opinion.
Review by Benor Mon Mar 31 2003 11:06 PM

Xenix,
Thanks for pointing that the numbers were expanded footnotes (I put crossouts in my original review).

You know, I also feel I should emphasize something that didn't really come across in my review. Although I was very critical, at the same time, I'm really glad "A Drug War Carol" exists. It conveys a lot of important information that people might not get in any other way. So I do want to applaud the creators for even tackling a project like this. Sometimes when picking on the aesthetic details, I miss the bigger picture.
Review by The Phantom Critic Mon Mar 31 2003 02:06 PM

The Phantom Critic said:
"There are numbers that would show up on assorted panels like the "22" here that seemed to make no sense. Maybe they are leftovers from some print version.
http://adrugwarcarol.com/ADWC.php?next=94"

For Phantom Critic and any others, those numbers bring up the full quote in question, other such bibliographical information, and the occasional anecdote/explanation.

Now then...

Review of "A Drug War Carol"
~Xenix

I often hear very logical and convincing arguments for one thing or another, and so I tend to stop and think when things are shown to me in a perfectly reasonable manner. Thus, after reading A Drug War Carol, I stopped to think. A lot, actually, but those thoughts are for a different forum.

The Story, The History, The Propaganda...
The "A Christmas Carol" look seems to fit for the statement they're making, and it certainly aids a little in the storytelling, but perhaps a different work might have been parodied to better effect. What especially sticks with me is how unbalanced it seems, with the Ghost of Christmas Past's visit being longer than the other two Ghosts put together.

The characters themselves are a little too flat and cookie-cutter-ized versions of people for my tastes. Given that it is a parody, these caricatures are understandable, but they still seem a bit too extreme, and the author's bias shows clearly in show places.

As a history lesson, it seemed to be very factual and well researched, even if I can't shake the feeling that this is only one perspective of the situation. It did give out information in a logical and easy to grasp manner, though, which was helpful to somebody who had never really thought about the subject before.

As propaganda, it was convincing up until the point when the Ghost of Christmas Past spoke of "idiocy". I didn't completely close my mind, not in the least, but it did serve to remind me that this was indeed a propaganda piece and that the author's bias was going to show through. It was a nice reminder, even if unintentional.

Visual Design
The visuals are nice and crisp. They tell as much, if not more, of a story as the wording does. Nothing was ever superior to what I might see in the Sunday funnies, but everything was drawn and colored competently, giving the entire comic a degree of respectability. Mostly, it allowed me to not be distracted by phenomenally good or bad artwork and focus on the story itself, which seemed to be the overall point.

Closing

Overall, it was a very nice read and I'm glad I took the time to do so (even though I should be heading off to see about getting registered for two classes in another 10 minutes). Not the best propaganda material in the world, but definitely above par. 7ish ectoplasmic beings out of 10.
Review by Xenix Mon Mar 31 2003 08:15 AM

"A Drug War Carol" review

Premise
This strip was recommended to me by a friend who felt I might be receptive to its agenda. I submitted it as my club selection, feeling it might be interesting for the club to review a strip that was designed primarily as propaganda rather than straight entertainment.

"A Drug War Carol" parodies Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol", featuring a "Scrooge McCzar" (American drug czar) who gets visited by the ghost of his old colleague and three other ghosts who take him on a learning journey that uncovers the history and evils of American anti-drug policies.

As Storytelling
While I am very sympathetic to the agenda (to legalize pot for at least medicinal purposes, if not outright), I don't feel that this comic is particularly effective as storytelling, history, parody or propaganda.

The characters in the original Dickens story were three dimensional (a couple of the film versions are so powerful that they move me to tears) whereas the characters in this comic are badly rendered props, slotted in to elicit either simplistic sympathy or derision.

As Parody
The "parody" aspect actually seems to break down as the comic focuses almost entirely on the "Ghost of Christmas Past", detailing the lengthy history of American anti-drug policy. By the time we get through that epic, there is little space (and little interest) left for the ghosts of present and future who merely impact the 2-dimensional characters in the story, which aren't the real point of this exercise anyway.

As History
The "history" aspect taken by itself, is the real reason to read this. If you know nothing about the history of American anti-drug policies, this comic will give you a somewhat decent overview. Though even as history, it isn't as clear and effective as it could be. I had trouble keeping track of the various anti-drug historical figures and it seemed to keep bouncing back and forth in time, which added to the confusion.

Also, sometimes the presentation of facts is a little confused. Len Bias was a University of Maryland basketball superstar who tragically died of a cocaine overdose two days after being drafted by had The Boston Celtics. And his death did have a huge impact on the "drug war" like the comic indicates. But identifying "Len Bias of the Boston Celtics" seems like the kind of not-quite-accurate description that only someone unfamiliar with the actual details of that event would make. Maybe I'm just being nitpicky (I attended Univ of Maryland in 1986, so it's a big personal memory), but it makes me skeptical about other potential simplifications.

For a more detailed history, there is a PBS Frontline documentary on this subject which I would highly recommend to anyone who wants a more thorough take on this subject
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/

As Propaganda
It's difficult for me to judge how persuasive the arguments are, as the comic is "preaching to the choir" with me. But I don't see how someone totally against drug legalization would be moved by the mawkish sentimentality and historical anecdotes arrayed in this comic. Perhaps its best to look at the comic as just a first step to get someone to question and research further the supposed truisms that the government spouts about marijuana. I think one would need more details regarding scientific studies on marijuana's addictiveness (or lack thereof), danger to health, history as a "gateway drug", etc. before being convinced one way or the other.

I also found the tone to be a little too earnest for my tastes as effective propaganda. I would have preferred a little more wit and mockery (a la George Carlin). It's not enough to just caricature drug war policy promoters like simplistic, moustache-twirling villains from a vaudeville melodrama.

Artwork
The drawings are competent and have a conventional realism—tables look like tables, people look like people and the perspective seems accurate. It resembles the style of an unremarkable silver age superhero comic book, but there's rarely any real pizzazz. You can recognize the presidential caricatures for who they're supposed to be but there is no Jack Davis/Mort Drucker sense of fun to the renderings.
http://adrugwarcarol.com/ADWC.php?next=104

Sometimes the visuals do nicely capture things in a way straight text couldn't. I really like how they depicted "Civil Asset Forfeiture" (a truly horrendous abuse of the law)
http://adrugwarcarol.com/ADWC.php?next=110
http://adrugwarcarol.com/ADWC.php?next=111

I thought The Ghost Of Christmas Future looked pretty kick ass. Heh. I just happen to dig that kind of supervillain look.
http://adrugwarcarol.com/ADWC.php?next=151

There are numbers that would show up on assorted panels like the "22" here that seemed to make no sense. Maybe they are leftovers from some print version.
http://adrugwarcarol.com/ADWC.php?next=94
[EDIT]These numbers are expanded footnotes[/EDIT]

A Final Personal Note
One final issue I have with the comic is that it seems to almost exclusively push the medicinal benefits of marijuana without emphasizing the impact pot has on broadening consciousness. I believe that to be the real reason that pot is so hated by the powers that be. Pot makes it very easy to see through the artificiality of current power structures. While the effects of pot are usually characterized in movies in a "Cheech & Chong"/stupid stoner dude way, what's missed is how pot (unlike alcohol) encourages peace and gives people a glimpse of the bigger picture and our shared humanity. It reduces fear and that is the last thing that that government wants—for how can you control a populace that doesn't live in fear?
Review by The Phantom Critic Sun Mar 30 2003 10:34 PM

Visitor Reviews & Comments

I submit this as a review of the reviews above, only because I think that a few points have to be made. I make no claim to be an expert on comic books, even though I have a degree in illustration and painting, it is a style in which I have only a passing personal interest (no offense intended). In ADWC I found that the art was good enough not to distract while serving it's illustrative and emotive purposes. The main 2 topics I want to address are first, the functionality of the piece as a political tool (propaganda) and the mythology surrounding pot as it relates to ADWC.

First, I found the peice accessible and fairly accurate, if a bit long winded. As with most comics, though, it is easy enough to skip around without losing too much (the pictures give you a good clue as to where you are) so I find that less of a fault here than I would in a written story. As a Libertarian and avid Drug Reform advocate, I was enthusiastic enough to send the link to the website to everyone in my address book. Some of my friends and family who are chilled to these ideas may find this presentation a little easier to digest, and hopefully they'll refer to it later if for nothing else than to understand the case for legalization. In that regard, it is far, far better than any after dinner conversation or policy debate I could initiate with these folks, people who I care about but who until now couldn't understand why I would be in favor of something so unsavory as LEGALIZING DRUGS (jaws agape). Maybe they still wont, but I think it is a good step in the right direction.

Second, I have to respond to the comment made about the "broadening conciousness" effects of marijuana. I find it deeply ironic that the same reviewer who panned ADWC's "mawkish sentimentality" would, in the same breath, indulge in the same sort of silliness by rhapsodizing weed. Without going into too much detail, I will just assert that what was said above is just as much an intellectualy dishonest and exagerated generalization as any Reefer Madness anti-drug propaganda piece. Every drug experience is a combination of factors including the setting, the user's mindset and expectations as well as their physical reaction to the drug. I have used Marijuana a hundred times, both for recreation and for releif of the pain and nausea associated with chronic migraines. It has been, on balance, harmless, but I choose not to use it because as I have gotten older I have become prone to panic attacks and nervousness when I smoke it. Far from expanding my conciousness, I obsess about minutia. The mild releif I get from it can easily be duplicated or exceeded by pharmacueticals, (please no maudlin cries about the superiority of natural medicine, it's all just chemicals when it hits your brain) and is outweighed by the negative effects. My experience is not unique. Some people enjoy pot, some don't. It wont cure cancer, nor will it take you to a higher plain. It can help a little with both and it sure wont kill you. The government fears a loss of Drug War revenue and power, not another summer of love.
Review by Dont Tread on Me Wed Dec 17 2003 12:17 AM

Summary Reviews for this title | Submit a title for review | Title Index